Wetland classification and inventory in fluvial basins: the case of the Yaguarí creek, North-Eastern Argentina

Authors

  • Leticia Rodríguez Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Hídricas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral
  • Carlos Ramonell Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Hídricas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral
  • Daniela García Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Hídricas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral
  • Emiliano Veizaga Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Hídricas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral
  • Silvio Graciani Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Hídricas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral
  • Alejandro Giraudo Instituto Nacional de Limnología- Universidad Nacional del Litoral-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Enrique Mihura Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Hídricas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.132.1-2.002

Keywords:

wetland classification, anthropogenic impact, geomorphology, creek, alluvial

Abstract


In preparation for the National Wetland Inventory, the Secretary for the Environment and Sustainable Development of Argentina defined pilot cases for their characterization and suggested methodologies for their classification. The results obtained on the pilot site of A° Yaguarí fluvial basin, Corrientes, are synthesized and presented in this paper. It is considered a pilot site due to the increasing anthropic activities: rice cultivation/irrigation and cattle grazing over implanted pastures that impact the natural wetlands. The identification of the types of wetlands was accomplished through the analysis of background information, visual interpretation of satellite images, identification of wet hydrologic periods, and wetland identification by direct field observation and reconnaissance. All these aspects were integrated to define the wetland types using a simple,hierarchical and open classification system, to establish the areal extent of the wetlands, and characterize their distinctive features at field scale. The elements of the selected hierarchical structure are: Ambient–Region-System-Unit Element. The ambient is continental, and the region belongs to Chaco-Mesopotamic Fluvial Corridor. Anthropogenic systems (units: ponds, rice fields, irrigation water reservoirs), and fluvial systems (units: floodplains, minor tributaries headwaters) are identified. The elements that can be found are: riparian forests, marshes behind river banks, ditches, paleo-channels, springs and riverbeds. The developed methodology can be replicated in similar basins using these tools for the inventory, evaluation and management of Argentinean wetlands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benzaquén, L., Blanco, D. E., Bó, R. F., Kandus, P., Lingua, G. F., Minotti, P., Quintana, R. y Vidal, L. 2013. Inventario de los humedales de Argentina: Sistemas de paisajes de humedales del Corredor Fluvial Paraná-Paraguay. Sec. de Amb. y Des. Sust. De Arg. Bs.As.

Benzaquén, L., Blanco, D.E., Bo, R., Kandus, P., Lingua, G., Minotti, P. y Quintana, R. (editores). 2017. Regiones de humedales de la Argentina. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable, Fundación Humedales/Wetlands International, Univ. Nac. San Martín y UBA.

Brinson, M.M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. 103 pp.

Brinson, M.M. 2008. Hydrogeomorphic wetland classification system: an overview and modification to better meet the needs of the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Technical Note No. 190-8-76.

Burkart, R., Bárbaro, N.O., Sánchez, R.O. y Gómez, D.A. 1999. Ecorregiones de la Argentina. Administración de Parques Nacionales: Buenos Aires. Pp. 1-42 pp.

CONACYT-CONAGUA, 2012. Estudio interdisciplinario de los humedales de la República Mexicana: Desarrollo metodológico para el inventario nacional de humedales y su validación a nivel piloto. Metodología estandarizada para la evaluación de humedales en México a nivel de sitio, escala 1:20.000. Fondo Sectorial de Investigación y Desarrollo sobre el Agua Proyecto 84369. CONACYT-CONAGUA.

Costa L.T., Farinha, J.C., Hecker, N. and Vives, P.T. 1996. Mediterranean wetland inventory: A Reference Manual. MedWet/Instituto da Conservacao da Naturaleza/Wetlands International Publication. Volume I.

Cowardin, L.M., Carter, V., Golet, F.C. and LaRoe, E.T. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States, U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 131 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4108

Davis, T.J. (Editor). 1994. The Ramsar Convention Manual: A guide for the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as waterfowl habitat. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland. 207 p.

Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Hídricas-FICH, 2017. Inventario de humedales en sitios piloto. Subcuenca del A° Yaguarí. Provincia de Corrientes. Proponente: Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable, Argentina.

Finlayson, C.M., Begg, G.W., Howes, J., Davies, J., Tagi, K. and Lowry, J. 2001. A manual of an inventory of Asian Wetlands. Version 1.0. Wetlands International Global Series 10, Kuala Lumpur, Malasya.

Frazier, S. 1998.Visión general de los Sitios Ramsar. Una sinopsis de los Sitios Ramsar. Wetlands International, Convención Sobre los Humedales, Wageningen, Holanda. 42 pp.

Giraudo, A.R., Bortoluzzi, A. y Arzamendia, V. 2006. Vertebrados tetrápodos de la Reserva y Sitio Ramsar "Esteros del Iberá" (Corrientes, Argentina): Análisis de su composición y nuevos registros de especies amenazadas. Natura Neotropicalis 37:1-20. https://doi.org/10.14409/natura.v1i37.3831

Giraudo, A.R. and Arzamendia, V. 2018. Descriptive bioregionalisation and conservation biogeography: what is the true bioregional representativeness of protected areas? Australian Systematic Botany, 30(6), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB16056

Ginzburg, R.G., Menéndez, A.N., Torrella, S.A., Gerbec, M.S. y Adámoli, J. M. 2014. Estudio para definir los parámetros y criterios ambientales de la Cuenca del río Miriñay. Estudio realizado para el Instituto Correntino del Agua y el Ambiente. ICCAA. 110 pp.

Herbst, R. y Santa Cruz, J. 1985. Mapa litoestratigráfico de la Provincia de Corrientes. Revista d' Orbignyana - Corrientes 2: 1-51.

INTA-EEA Corrientes. Recursos Naturales. 2001. Suelos y vegetación de los departamentos Sauce y Curuzú Cuatiá, Provincia de Corrientes. 314 pp.

Junk W.J, Piedade M.T.F., Lourival, R., Wittmann, F., P. Kandus et al. 2014. Brazilian wetlands: their definition, delineation, and classification for research, sustainable management, and protection. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 24: 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2386

Mira A., Veroslavsky, G., Rossello, E., Vives, L. and Rodríguez, L. 2015. Subsurface geological modeling of Corrientes province (NE Argentina) and its influence in the Guaraní Aquifer System. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 62, 148-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2015.05.007

Mitch, W.J. and Gosselink, J. 2000. Wetlands. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 736pp.

Miteco (Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica), 2019. https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/biodiversidad/servicios/

banco-datos-naturaleza/informacion-disponibleinventario_esp_zonas_humedas_descargas.aspx, Acceso 20/1/2019.

Myres, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B., and Kent, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, volume 403, 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501 PMid:10706275

Rabinovich, J. and Rapoport, E. 1975. Geographical variation in the diversity of Argentine passerine birds. Journal of Biogeography. 2:141-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/3037987

Ricaurte, L.F., Patiño, J.E., Zambrano, D.F.R. et al. 2019. A classification system for Colombian wetlands: an essential step forward in open environmental policy-making. Wetlands, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01149-8

Rujana, M.R. y Currie, H.M. 2005. Estrategias de asignación y gerencia del agua en la cuenca del río Miriñay, Corrientes. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Argentina. Comunicaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas. 4 pp.

Schnack J.A, De Francesco1, F.O., Colado, U.R., Novoa, M.L. y Schnack, E.J. 2000. Humedales antrópicos: su contribución para la conservación de la biodiversidad en los dominios subtropical y pampásico de la Argentina. Ecología Austral, 10:63-80.

Scott, D.A. (compiler) 1989. A directory of Asian wetlands. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Strahler, A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 38(6), 913-920. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913

Verstappen, H.Th. and Van Zuidam, R.A. 1991. The ITC System of Geomorphologic Survey: A basis for the evaluation of natural resources and hazards. Pub. ITC No. 10, The Netherlands, 89 pp.

Wege, D.C. and Long, A.J. 1995. Key areas for threatened birds in the Neotropics. Bird Life International. Cambridge, U.K.

Wilen, B.O., Carter, V. and Jones, J.R. 1996. Wetland Mapping and Inventory. National Water Summary on Wetland Resources. United States Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2425.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Rodríguez, L., Ramonell, C., García, D., Veizaga, E., Graciani, S., Giraudo, A., & Mihura, E. (2021). Wetland classification and inventory in fluvial basins: the case of the Yaguarí creek, North-Eastern Argentina. Boletín Geológico Y Minero, 132(1-2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.132.1-2.002

Issue

Section

Articles