Discovery of the Magdalena ore body. The leading role of geophysical methods for the exploration of a deep volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits (VMS) in the Iberian Pyrite Belt

Authors

  • Ángel Granda Sanz International Geophysical Technology, S.L.
  • Teresa Granda París International Geophysical Technology, S.L.
  • Juan Manuel Pons Minas de Aguas Teñidas, S.A.U.
  • Juan Carlos Videira Minas de Aguas Teñidas, S.A.U.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.130.2.001

Keywords:

discovery, down-hole TEM, geophysical methods, the Magdalena, massive sulphides

Abstract


The Magdalena volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposit, located in the province of Huelva (Spain) and discovered by Minas de Aguas Teñidas S.A.U. (MATSA) in 2013 constitutes the largest discovery to be made in the Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB) in recent decades. During a first phase of exploration, the deposit was discovered by drill testing a conductivity anomaly that was first detected during an airborne (helicopter) transient electromagnetic survey (VTEM) in 2011. Drill-hole MA-01 intersected the massive sulphide body at a depth of between 225 m and 248 m. Throughout the drilling campaign of the sulphide body later named “Masa 1”, the drill holes were surveyed using Downhole TEM and Mise-à-la-Masse geophysical methods and during this work the Downhole TEM results from drill hole MA-21, which was originally drilled to 320 m, detected the presence of a deeper and larger sulphide body. The appearance of an off-hole, down-hole TEM anomaly in hole MA-21 was fundamental in the discovery of “Masa 2” which was made once the drill rig was recollared on the original MA-21 pad and drilled to a depth of 530 m. This second sulphide lens (“Masa 2”) was not detected by the initial VTEM survey because it was beyond the range for the system and was subsequently drill tested at depths between 350 and 1,000 m. The discovery of the Magdalena deposit has demonstrated the crucial role of certain geophysical methods for the detection of deep VMS deposits and confirms the prospectivity of the IPB as a metallogenic area of undoubted potential as far as the existence of similar deposits are concerned.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Campbell, N. 2016. Resource Potentials - Australia. Comunicación personal.

Duncan, A. 2014. Digiatlantis Borehole TEM at Lalor. British Columbia Geophysical Society. Exploration for Deep VMS Ore Bodies. The Hudbay Lalor Case Study.

Galley, A. and Ames, D. 2014. Important characteristics of VMS deposits for deep exploration. British Columbia Geophysical Society. Exploration for Deep VMS Ore Bodies. The Hudbay Lalor Case Study.

Hopgood, D. and Hungerford, N. 1994. Geophysical case history of the discovery of the Aguas Teñidas East massive sulphide deposit, SW Spain. Exploration Geophysics 25 (1) 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG994001

Le Roux, C and Macnae, J. 2007. SQUID Sensors for EM systems. Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration. 417-423.

Scrivens, S. 2005. A comparison between Helicopter and Fixed-Wing Time Domain Electromagnetic Systems. Department of Earth Sciences. Carleton University. Otawa. Ontario.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Granda Sanz, Ángel, Granda París, T., Pons, J. M., & Videira, J. C. (2019). Discovery of the Magdalena ore body. The leading role of geophysical methods for the exploration of a deep volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits (VMS) in the Iberian Pyrite Belt. Boletín Geológico Y Minero, 130(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.130.2.001

Issue

Section

Articles