Geophysical methods as a tool for improving our knowledge of ornamental rock deposits and their exploitation

Authors

  • A. Espín de Gea Departamento de Geología, Topografía y Geofísica, Centro Tecnológico del Mármol, Piedra y Materiales
  • M. Reyes Urquiza Departamento de Geología, Topografía y Geofísica, Centro Tecnológico del Mármol, Piedra y Materiales
  • A. Gil Abellán Departamento de Geología, Topografía y Geofísica, Centro Tecnológico del Mármol, Piedra y Materiales

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.128.2.006

Keywords:

borehole, deposit, geophysics, ornamental stone, resistivity

Abstract


The ornamental rock sector, particularly the investigation of deposits, is not readily given to the incorporation of new technologies. The Marble Technology Center (CTM) has made advances in this sector with the implementation of geophysical techniques able to obtain subsurface information. There are still a few outcrops and active quarries where joint geophysical techniques have been applied sufficiently to obtain a three-dimensional model of the study area.

The application of geophysics and more specifically, ground penetrating radar, electrical tomography and seismic refraction, when conducting research of a reservoir or outcrop, is only slightly aggressive to the environment, allowing a real knowledge of the characteristics before beginning the more aggressive work, as is the case when conducting surveys and test pits which can subsequently complement the data obtained. This makes it possible to gain a good idea of the quality of the reservoir thus allowing optimization of resources, both financial and environmental beforehand.

Several studies conducted by the CTM illustrate the benefits brought by the application of these geophysical techniques as well as the weaknesses within the characteristics of the extraction sites and ornamental rock outcrops.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbiss, C.P. (1981). Shear wave measurements of the elasticity of the ground. Geotechnique, Vol 31, no.1, p.91-104. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1981.31.1.91

Beres, M., Luetsher, M. and Olivier, R. (2001). Integration of ground penetrating radar and microgravimetric methods to map shallow caves. Journal of Applied Geophysics 46, 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00042-8

Collins, M. E., Cumb, M. and Hanninenc, P. (1994). Geoderma. Volume 61, Issues 1-2, Pages 1-15.

Conyers, L. B. (2004). Ground-penetrating Radar for Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA, United States: AltaMira Press Ltd.

Daniels, D. J. (ed.) (2004). Ground Penetrating Radar (2nd Ed.). Knoval (Institution of Engineering and Technology). https://doi.org/10.1049/PBRA015E

Espín de Gea, A. (2009). Analysis of karsts cave structure for the location of a new entrance using 3D images obtained by ground penetrating radar. IWAGPR 2009.

Espín de Gea, A., Reyes, M., Gil, A. y Arévalo, L. (2014). Modelización geológica tridimensional del yacimiento de roca ornamental ubicado en Monte Coto parcelas K, C y D. (Inédito).

Federación Española de la Piedra. (2013). Fondos propios.

Granda, A. y Cambero, J.C. (2012). Introducción al método de la Tomografía Eléctrica. International Geophysical Technology, S.L. (lgt).

Gómez López, R. (2008). Aplicación del radar de penetración en tierra (georadar) a la exploración no destructiva de yacimientos arqueológicos. http://maxwell.ugr.es/ProyectoRaf/final2-babel-spanish.pdf.

IGME (2011). Panorama minero. Piedra natural. Disponible en: www.igme.es/internet/PanoramaMinero/PMLin.htm

Menke, W. (1984). Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. Academic Press, Orlando. USA.

Parasnis. D.S. (1997). Principles of Applied Geophysic. Chapman & Hall.

Sharma, P.V. (2004). Enviromental and engineering geophysics. Cambridge University Press.

Telford,W.M., Geldart,L.P., Sheriff, R.E. (1990). Apllied geophysics. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167932

Trabajos Investigación Geológico Minera. Centro Tecnológico del Mármol. Proyectos propios.

Williams, P. W. (2008). The role of the epikarts in karst and cave hydrogeology: a review. International journal of Speleology 37, 1-10. Bologna (Italy). ISSN 0392-6672. https://doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.37.1.1

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

How to Cite

Espín de Gea, A., Reyes Urquiza, M., & Gil Abellán, A. (2017). Geophysical methods as a tool for improving our knowledge of ornamental rock deposits and their exploitation. Boletín Geológico Y Minero, 128(2), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.128.2.006

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)