Basic theory of the Magnetic Resonance Sounding Method

Authors

  • J. L. Plata Instituto Geológico y Minero de España
  • F. M. Rubio Instituto Geológico y Minero de España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.118.3.002

Keywords:

Magnetic Resonance Sounding, mathematical model, MRS, time decay, water signal

Abstract


When an electromagnetic field of one specific frequency equal to the Larmor frequency of hydrogen protons is sent to the underground by a transmitter on the surface part of its energy is absorbed exclusively by the water molecules. When the excitation field is removed, the absorbed energy is released in the form of a new electromagnetic field which can be detected by a receiver at the surface. This response can only be produced by water, and has some identity characteristics: the released energy has the Larmor frequency for hydrogen protons and produces a voltage e(t) which amplitude decays exponentially with time until it vanishes, at a rate or decay time that depends on the mean size of the pores. The maximum voltage amplitude is directly proportional to the amount of water. When the excitation field is increased the signal comes from deeper parts of the subsurface, allowing making a sounding (Magnetic Resonance Sounding, MRS). The principal factors that affect the measured water signal are the depth and thickness of the water bearing layer, the electrical conductivity of the subsurface, the magnitude and inclination of the geomagnetic field, the type of water containing rocks, the size of the antenna and the electromagnetic noise. The general rule is that the maximum amplitude of the signal decreases when increasing the depth of the aquifer. The existence of rocks with high conductivity has a screening effect that lowers the amplitude of the water signal and causes the depth of investigation to be decreased. When magnetic rocks are present, the intensity and gradient of the geomagnetic field is different in different parts of the subsurface what causes the Larmor frequency be also different and hence MRS signal can not be detected. The best conditions are met in resistive-non magnetic environments, high latitudes, and coarse grained rocks. A mathematical model of the physical phenomenon and its measurement allows getting the theoretical signal produced by a defined configuration of the ground water and rocks distribution in the subsurface (modelling or direct problem), as well as deducing the aquifers configuration (distribution of the amount of water and time decay with depth) from the MRS signal actually measured in the field (inversion or inverse problem). Accuracy of the results depends on the signal quality and the hypothesis and assumptions made in the model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bernard, J. 2006. Instruments and field work to measure a MRS with NUMIS systems. Proceedings 3rd MRS International Workshop, Madrid, Spain, 7-10.

Bernard, J. 2007. Instruments and field work to measure a Magnetic Resonance Sounding. Boletín Geológico y Minero, 118(3), 459-472.

Braun, M. and Yaramanci, U. 2003. Inversions of surface-NMR signal using complex kernels. Proceedings 9th Meeting EEGS, Praga, O-049. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201414524

Dunn, K.J., Bergman, D.J., Latorraca, G.A. 2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance petrophysical and logging applications. Pergamon, Amsterdam, 293 pp.

Girard, J.F., Legchenko, A., Boucher, M. and Baltassat, J.M. 2006. Topographic effects on MRS results. Proceedings 3rd International MRS Workshop, Madrid, Spain, 29-32.

Goldman, M., Rabinovich, B., Rabinovich, M., Gilad, D., Gev, I., Schirov, M. 1994. Application of the integrated NMR-TDEM method in groundwater exploration in Israel. Journal of Applied Geophysics 31, 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-9851(94)90045-0

Guillen, A. and Legchenko, A. 2002. Application of linear programming techniques to the inversion of proton magnetic resonance measurements for water prospecting from the surface. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00136-2

Hertrich, M., Braun, M. and Yaramanci, U. 2005a. High resolution 2D inversion of separate loop Magnetic Resonance Sounding (MRS). Proceedings of 11th EAGE Near Surface Meeting, Palermo, Italy. Paper A021. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.13.A021

Hertrich, M., Braun, M. and Yaramanci, U. 2005b. Magnetic resonance soundings with separated transmitter and receiver loops. Near Surface Geophysics 3, 141-154. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2005010

Hunter, D. and Kepic, A. 2003. Depth of SNMR signal contribution in conductive terrains. Proceedings 2nd MRS Workshop, Orleans, France, 45-48.

Legchenko, A. 2003a. A revised mathematical model of magnetic resonance sounding. Proceedings 2nd MRS Workshop, Orleans, France, 65-68.

Legchenko, A. 2003b. On the inversion of complex magnetic resonance signals. Proceedings 9th EEGS Meeting, Prague, Czech Republic. Paper O-048. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201414523

Legchenko, A. 2005. Improved modelling of the magnetic resonance signal in the presence of shallow aquifers. Near Surface Geophysics 3, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2005008

Legchenko, A. 2006. Interpretation of MRS measurements in rocks with high electrical conductivity. Proceedings 3rd International MRS Workshop, Madrid, Spain, 45-48.

Legchenko, A. 2007. MRS measurements and inversion in presence of EM noise. Boletín Geológico y Minero, 118(3), 489-508.

Legchenko, A., Baltassat, J.M., Beauce, A. and Bernard, J. 2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00128-3

Legchenko, A., Baltassat, J.M., Beauce, A., Chigot, D. 1997a. Application of proton magnetic resonance for detection of fractured chalk aquifers from the surface. Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Aarhus, Denmark, 115-118. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201407291

Legchenko, A., Baltassat, J.M., Beauce, A., Makki, M.A., Al-Gaydi, B.A. 1998. Application of the surface proton magnetic resonance method for direct detection of fractured granite aquifers. Proceedings 4th EEGS Meeting, Barcelona, Spain, 163-166. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201407070

Legchenko, A., Beauce, A., Guillen, A., Valla, P. and Bernard, J. 1996. Capability of the NMR applied to aquifers investigation from the surface. Proceedings of 2nd EEGS Meeting, Nantes, France, 70-73.

Legchenko, A., Beauce, A., Guillen, A., Valla, P. and Bernard, J. 1997b. Natural variations in the magnetic resonance signal used in PMR groundwater prospecting from the surface. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2, 173-190.

Legchenko, A., Semenov, A.G. and Schirov, M.D. 1990. A device for measurement of subsurface water saturated layer parameters. USSR patent 1540515 (in Russian).

Legchenko, A. and Shushakov, O. 1998. Inversion of surface NMR data. Geophysics 63, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444329

Legchenko, A. and Valla, P. 2002. A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00127-1

Lieblich, D.A., Legchenko, A.V., Haeni, F.P. and Portselan, A.A. 1994. Surface nuclear magnetic resonance experiments to detect subsurface water at Haddam Meadows (Connecticut). Proceeding of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Vol 2, Boston, MA, USA, 717-736. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922100

Lubczynski, M.W. and Roy, J. 2007. Use of MRS for hydrogeological system parameterization and modelling. Boletín Geológico y Minero, 118(3), 509-530.

Mejias, M. and Plata, J. 2007. General concepts in Hydrogeology and Geophysics related to MRS. Boletín Geológico y Minero, 118(3), 423-440.

Mohnke, O. and Yaramanci, U. 2002. Smooth and block inversion of surface NMR amplitudes and decay times using simulated annealing. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00137-4

Mohnke, O. and Yaramanci, U. 2005. Forward and inverse modelling of MRS relaxation signals using multi-exponential decomposition. Proceedings 11th EAGE Near Surface Meeting, Palermo, Italy. Paper P057. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.13.P057

Plata, J.L. and Rubio, F.M. 2001. Condiciones para la utilización de los Sondeos de Resonancia Magnética (SRM) en la prospección y gestión de las aguas subterráneas. Congreso Internacional Las Caras del Agua. Libro de Comunicaciones tomo II, 807-813 (in Spanish).

Plata, J. and Rubio, F. 2002. MRS experiments in a noisy area of a detrital aquifer in the South of Spain. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00131-3

Plata, J.L. and Rubio, F.M. 2003. Is MRS methodology ready to fulfil the hydrogeologists demands?. Proceedings 2nd International MRS Workshop, Orleans, France, 93-96.

Plata, J.L. and Rubio, F.M. 2005. MRS experiment using HYDROSCOPE instrument: some remarks. Proceedings 67th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Madrid, Spain, CD PO86. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.1.P334

Plata, J.L., Rubio, F.M., Carceller, T., Azcón, A. 2004. Investigación de parámetros hidrodinámicos y geométricos en acuíferos aluviales de la cuenca del Ebro mediante Sondeos de Resonancia Magnética (SRM). Informe Fondo Documental IGME nº 62797. (in Spanish).

Pusep, A., Bashurova, V., Shokhirev, N. and Burshtein, A. 1991. Software development for the NMR tomography of subsurface water bearing horizons. USSR Academy of Sciences. Novosibirsk, 89 (in Russian).

Rommel, I., Hertrich, M., Yaramanci, U. 2006. The effect of topography on MRS measurements with separated loops. Proceedings 3rd International MRS Workshop, Madrid, Spain, 33-36.

Roy, J., Lubczynski, M.W. 2005. MRS multi-exponential decay analysis: aquifer pore size distribution and vadose zone characterization. Near Surface Geophysics 3, 287-298. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2005024

Roy, J., Rouleau, A., Chouteau, M. and Bureau, M. 2006. Widespread occurrence of aquifers currently undetectable with the MRS technique in the Grenville Geological Province, Canada. Proceedings 3rd MRS international workshop, Madrid, Spain, 113-116.

Rubio, F.M., Plata, J.L. 2005. MRS survey in a detrital coastal aquifer in Castellon-Spain. Near Surface Geophysics Vol 3, N3, 215-222. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2005016

Schirov, M.D. and Rojkowski, A.D. 2002. On the accuracy of parameters determination from SNMR measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00140-4

Schirov, M., Legchenko, A. and Creer, J. 1991. New direct non-invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia. Exploration Geophysics 22, 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG991333

Semenov, A.G. 1987. The experience in the application of nuclear magnetic resonance for the exploration of subterranean waters. IX Ampere summer school on magnetic resonance, Novosibirsk. Abstract 61 (in Russian).

Semenov, A.G., Burshtein, A.I., Pusep, A.Y. and Schirov, M.D. 1988. A device for measurement of underground mineral parameters. USSR Patent 1079063 (in Russian).

Semenov, A.G., Pusep, A. and Shirov, M.D. 1982. Hydroscope- An installation for prospecting without drilling. USSR Academy of Sciences. Novosibirsk, 1-26 (in Russian).

Semenov, A.G., Schirov, M.D. and Legchenko, A.V. 1987. On the technology of subterranean water exploration founded on application of the nuclear magnetic resonance tomography "Hydroscope". IX Ampere summer school on magnetic resonance, Novosibirsk. Abstracts, 214 (in Russian).

Semenov, A.G., Schirov, M.D., Legchenko, A.V., Burshtein, A.I. and Pusep, A. 1989. Device for measuring the parameter of underground mineral deposit. GB Patent 2198540B.

Shushakov, O. A. 1996. Groundwater NMR in conductive water. Geophysics 61, 998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444048

Shushakov, O. 2006. Bloch-Siegert effect in MRS. Proceedings 3rd International MRS Workshop, Madrid, Spain, 53-56.

Shushakov, O.A. and Legchenko, A.V. 1994a. Calculation of proton magnetic resonance signal of underground water considering medium electric conductivity. Geology and Geophysics 35, 130-136 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.2113/RGG.1994.35.3.111

Shushakov, O.A. and Legchenko, A.V. 1994b. Groundwater proton magnetic resonance in the horizontally stratified media of different electrical conductivity. Geology and Geophysics 35, 161-166 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.2113/RGG.1994.35.10.119

Trushkin, D.V., Shushakov, O.A. and Legchenko, A.V. 1994. The potential of a noise-reducing antenna for surface NMR groundwater surveys in the Earth's magnetic field. Geophysical Prospecting 42, 855-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00245.x

Trushkin, D.V., Shushakov, O.A. and Legchenko, A.V. 1995. Surface NMR applied to an electroconductive medium. Geophysical Prospecting 43, 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00271.x

Valla, P. and Legchenko, A. 2002. One-dimensional modelling for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements over an electrically conductive medium. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00141-6

Varian, R.H. 1962. Ground liquid prospecting method and apparatus. U.S. Patent 3019383.

Weichman, P. and Lavely, E. 1999. Generalized forward theory of surface NMR. 1st SNMR Workshop, Berlin, Germay, Paper 16.

Weichman, P., Lavely, E. and Ritzwoller, M.H. 2000 Theory of surface nuclear magnetic resonance with applications to geophysical imaging problems. Physical Review E.62[1], 1290-1312. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1290

Weichman, P., Lun, D.R., Ritzwoller, M.H. and Lavely, E. 2002. Study of surface nuclear magnetic resonance inverse problems. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00135-0

Yaramanci, U. and Hertrich, M. 2007. Inversion of Magnetic Resonance Sounding data. Boletín Geológico y Minero, 118(3), 473-488.

Downloads

Published

2007-09-30

How to Cite

Plata, J. L., & Rubio, F. M. (2007). Basic theory of the Magnetic Resonance Sounding Method. Boletín Geológico Y Minero, 118(3), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.118.3.002

Issue

Section

Articles