Significance of the “cut off-average grade-tonnage” sensitivity analysis in mining projects

Authors

  • Luis de la Torre Palacios Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • José Antonio Espi Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.130.1.008

Keywords:

cut-off, mining quality standards, mining projects, resources qualification, sensitivity analysis technical reports

Abstract


The sensitivity analysis applied to the grade-tonnage relationship in mining projects is a recognized stage in all existing quality standards. However, once presented, the results are hardly commented on or criticized. This study analyzes more than 50 projects grouped by copper and gold metallogenetic models which find their own characteristics in the tonnage evolution curves by varying the cut-off grade. In addition, when considering the categories of quality in information regarding resources, those which are classified as inferred usually denote a lack of quality. This study also offers an explanation about the behaviour of ore typologies with important resources and non-abrupt grade variations, with other typologies with well-declared anisotropies and strong structural controls.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chapman P. F., & Roberts F. 1983. Metal Resources and Energy: Butterworths. Monographs in Materials. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-408-10801-0.50007-9

De Young, J.H. 1981. The Lasky cumulative tonnage-grade relationship. A reexamination. Economic Geology, 76, 1067-1080. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.76.5.1067

Gerst M. D. 2008. Revisiting the Cumulative Grade-Tonnage Relationship for Major Copper Ore Types. Economic Geology, 103, 615-628. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.103.3.615

Joint Ore Reserves Committee (2012). Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia. The JORC Code, Chapter 14.

Lasky, S.G. 1950. How tonnage and grade relationships help predict ore reserves. Engineering and Mining Journal, 151, 81-85.

Manteca J. I. 1993. Seguimiento y control geológico de una explotación minera (Unpubl. PhD Thesis). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas.

Musgrove, P.A. 1965. Lead grade-tonnage relation. Mining Magazine, 112, 249-251.

Musgrove, P.A. 1971. The distribution of metal resources (tests and implications of the exponential grade-size relationship. Council on Economics, American Institute for Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Proceedings, p. 349-417.

Osanloo M., Rashidinejad F., & Rezai B. 2008. Incorporating environmental issues into optimum cut-off grades modeling at porphyry copper deposits. Resources Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2008.06.001

Silva F. & Soares A. 2002. Grade Tonnage Curve: How Far Can It Be Relied Upon? Somincor - Sociedade Mineira de Neves-Corvo, S.A. CMRP - Instituto Superior Técnico - Lisboa, Portugal www.kgs.ku.edu/Conferences/IAMG/Sessions/D/Papers/silva.pdf

Singer & Young J.1980. What can grade-tonnage relation really tele us. Memoire du BRGM. N 106.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-30

How to Cite

de la Torre Palacios, L., & Espi, J. A. (2019). Significance of the “cut off-average grade-tonnage” sensitivity analysis in mining projects. Boletín Geológico Y Minero, 130(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.130.1.008

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)