VES and global optimisation methods: a different perspective to analyze equivalent models in applied geophysics

Authors

  • J. Paulino Fernández Álvarez Dpto. de Explotación y Prospección de Minas, Area de Investigación y Prospección Minera Escuela de Minas, Universidad de Oviedo
  • J. Luis Fernández Martínez Dpto. de Matemáticas, Area de Matemática Aplicada, Universidad de Oviedo
  • C. Omar Menéndez Pérez Dpto. de Matemáticas, Area de Matemática Aplicada, Universidad de Oviedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.118.1.003

Keywords:

bayesian approach, genetic algorithms, resistive inverse problem, simulated annealing, vertical electrical soundings

Abstract


The vertical Electrical Sounding problem is ill posed. Small data disturbances propagate backwards and contaminate notably the solution. Classical interpretation of the inverse problem as a parameter estimation case searches for a unique model. Yet, many models –known as equivalent models- are able to fit data equally well. Local optimization techniques provide unstable solutions, probably very different from the global minimum. Global optimization methods, are probabilistic strategies able to explore the whole model space and to find, asymptotically at least, the global minimum of the problem. Two of these techniques have been programmed, used and are described here: simulated annealing and genetic algorithms. Both are very important in the Bayesian concept of the inverse problem, better issued for practical engineering decision purposes. In the Bayesian framework, the goal is to determine the a posteriori probability distribution of the solution, given data and external a priori information. More interesting yet than their global convergence properties is the fact that, run in a certain way, they provide the sample needed to estimate this a posteriori p.d.f. Justification is given to the use of G.A for these purposes, both through synthetic reasoning and with a practical decision case related to a groundwater coastal intrusion problem in Murcia (Spain).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Battacharya, B.B., Sen, M.K. 2003. Use of VFSA for resolution, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in 1D DC resistivity and IP inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 51, pp. 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00379.x

Curtis, A., Lomax, A. 2001. Tutorial: Prior information, sampling distributions and the curse of dimensionality. Geophysics, vol. 66, nº2, pp. 372-378. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444928

Fernández Alvarez P. 2004. Análisis y resolución numérica de un problema inverso en geofísica medioambiental. Aplicación al caso de los sondeos eléctricos Verticales. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Oviedo.

Fernández Alvarez P., Fernández Martínez J.L, y Menéndez Pérez C.O. 2004a. A posteriori inference of model parameters in a geophysical inverse problem using G.A. in Soft Methodology and Random Information Systems. Advances in soft computing, pp.709-711. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44465-7_88

Gosh, D.P. 1971a. The application of linear filter theory to the direct interpretation of geoelectrical resistivity sounding measurements. Geophysical Prospecting, 19, pp.192-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1971.tb00593.x

Gosh, D.P. 1971b. Inverse filter coefficients for the computation of apparent resistivity standard curves for a horizontally stratified earth. Geophysical Prospecting, 19, pp. 769-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1971.tb00915.x

Hadamard, J. 1923. Lectures on Cauchy problem in linear partial differential equations. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Hansen, C. 1998. Rank deficient and discrete Ill-posed problems, numerical aspects of linear inversion. Philadelphia, Library of Congress. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719697

Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. 1988. Prospección eléctrica en Águilas (Murcia). Informe inédito.

Ingber, L. 1989. Very fast simulated reannealing. Math. Comput. Modelling, vol 12, nº 8, pp. 967-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(89)90202-1

Ingber, L., Rosen, B. 1992. Genetic algorithms and very fast simulated reannealing: a comparison. Math. Comput. Modelling, vol 16, nº11, pp. 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(92)90108-W

Kass, R.E., Wassermann, L. 1996. The selection of prior distributions by formal rules. Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 91, nº435, pp.1343-1396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10477003

Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, D.D., and Vecchi, M.P. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, vol 220, pp. 671-680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671

Koefoed, O. 1979. Geosounding Principles, 1. Amsterdam, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

Malinverno, A., Torres-Verdín, C. 2000. Bayesian Inversion of DC electrical measurements with uncertainties for reservoir monitoring. Inverse Problems, 16, pp.1343-1356. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/16/5/313

Malinverno, A., Briggs, A.V. 2004. Expanded uncertainty quantification in inverse problems: Hierarchical Bayes and Empirical Bayes. Geophysics, v 69, nº4, pp.1005-1016. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1778243

Menke, W. 1989. Geophysical Data analysis: discrete inverse theory (revised edition). California, Library of Congress.

Michalewicz, A. 1992. Genetic Algorithm + data structures= evolution programs. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02830-8

Moseegard, K., Tarantola, A. 1995. Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems. Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 100, nºB7, pp. 12431-12447. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB03097

Orellana, E., Mooney, H.M. 1966. Master tables and curves for vertical electrical soundings. Tablas y curvas para sondeos eléctricos verticales (en inglés y español). Interciencia. Madrid.

Orellana, E. 1982. Prospección geoeléctrica en corriente continua. Madrid, ed. Paraninfo.

Patra, H.P., Nath, S.K. 1999. Schlumberger Geoelectric Sounding in Ground Water (Principles, Interpretation and Applications). A.A. Balkema.

Pekeris C.L. 1940. Direct method of interpretation in resistivity prospecting. Geophysics, vol 5, pp.31-42. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441791

Scales, J.A., Snieder, R. 1997. To Bayes or not to Bayes?. Geophysics, vol. 62, nº4, pp.1045-1046. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.6241045.1

Scales, J.A., Snieder, R. 2000. The anatomy of inverse problems. Geophysics, vol 65, nº 6, pp. 1708-1710. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2000-0001.1

Slichter, L.B. 1933. Interpretation of resistivity prospecting for horizontal structures. Physics, vol 4, pp. 307-322 (and p. 407). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745198

Stefanesco, S.S., Schlumberger, C. y M. 1930. Sur la distribution électrique potentielle autour d'une prise de terre ponctuelle dans un terrain à couches horizontales. Jour. Physique et le Radium, v. 1, pp.132-140. https://doi.org/10.1051/jphysrad:0193000104013200

Tarantola, A., Valette, B. 1982a. Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the linear least squares criterion. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys, 20, 2, pp.219-232. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i002p00219

Tarantola, A., Valette, B. 1982b. Inverse problems = quest for information. J. Geophys, 50, pp.159-170.

Tarantola, A. 1987. Inverse Problem Theory. Amsterdam, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P., Sheriff, R.E. 1990. Applied Geophysics. Cambridge University Press, second edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167932

Downloads

Published

2007-03-30

How to Cite

Fernández Álvarez, J. P., Fernández Martínez, J. L., & Menéndez Pérez, C. O. (2007). VES and global optimisation methods: a different perspective to analyze equivalent models in applied geophysics. Boletín Geológico Y Minero, 118(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.118.1.003

Issue

Section

Articles